COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT PROJECT: HOME OFFICE DRUG INTERVENTIONS PROGRAMME
REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY LED RESEARCH PROJECT FOCUSSING
ON A GAP ANALYSIS OF TREATMENT SERVICES FOR BLACK AND MINORITY
ETHNIC SUBSTANCE MISUSERS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
‘REACH
REPORT’ BY THE BAC-IN BLACK AND MINORITY ETHNIC PROJECT
COMMUNITY
IN NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
SUMMARY REPORT
The full Reach Report is available in PDF format
here
(You will need Adobe Reader to read this file. If you
do not have Adobe Reader then you can download it free by
clicking
here.)
Manjit Singh Johal, Sohan Sahota
March 2007
Funded by the Home Office, managed and supported
by
The Centre for Ethnicity and Health, University of Central
Lancashire
Introduction
This
document is a summary of the ‘Reach Report’ by
the BAC-IN Black and minority ethnic project; a Community
Engagement Project report within the Home Office Drug Interventions
Programme (DIP).
The
main report was produced in March 2006 as a result of a community
led research project focusing on a needs analysis of treatment
services for Black and minority ethnic substance misusers
in the criminal justice system.
This
summary report encapsulates the aims of the main report, the
methodology used for the research and the findings arising
from the research project. It also summarises the recommendations
made in the main report.
Attached
to this summary report is a brief outline of BAC-IN and developments
that have happened since the Reach Report was produced and
can be seen as resulting from the report itself.
The
target group for the research project was male Black and minority
ethnic substance misusers over the age of 18 within the prison
service, engaged with the Probation Service or the local CJIT
or in the community. The target community for the report was
Nottinghamshire.
The
BAC-IN Black and minority ethnic project was appointed to
carry out the research due to their knowledge of drug related
issues in the Black and minority ethnic community; the fact
that the team are all ex substance misusers; have strong links
to the local Black and minority ethnic community and are aware
of the increasing problem of drug use within that community.
Aim
of the Report
The
Reach Report sets out to examine how far the aim of the Drug
Interventions Programme to provide a beginning to end support
programme for offenders with drug problems passing through
the criminal justice system is a reality for BME substance
misusers in Nottinghamshire. It also aims to build on the
work of the recent ASK report to examine the experience of
Black and minority ethnic substance misusers in prison and
after their release.
“A Beginning-To-End Support System
Offenders
are unlikely to come into contact with the programme just
once, and their support needs will not end when they finish
their sentence or treatment. Therefore, DIP interventions
form part of a beginning to end support programme that follows
and manages offenders as they pass through the criminal justice
system, covering the following areas:
•
Police custody
• Treatment
• The courts and probation
• Through care and aftercare
• Prison
This
is called ‘intensive’ DIP – the full package.”
Drug
Interventions Programme, Nottinghamshire County Strategy Document
April 2004
“During
the course of this research it became apparent that there
are real opportunities to undertake specific work with BME
offenders, prisoners and ex-prisoners. A review would look
into the treatment being received whilst in prison and the
links and relationships between prison based and community
based services. The review would also take into account the
current provision of through care and aftercare services for
[Black and minority ethnic] substance using offenders across
the county [of Nottinghamshire].
The
research could concentrate on service providers both in prison
and the community; and track substance using offenders in
prison and after their release.”
Ask
Report: Asking Nottinghamshire’s Black and Minority
Ethnic people and communities about substance misuse –
their needs and experiences.
Sheik-Latif, N. and Smith, Z. November 2005
Overall
the Reach Report seeks to:
• understand and analyse the experience of Black and
minority ethnic substance misusers in the criminal justice
system;
• analyse how effectively Black and minority ethnic
offenders with substance misuse problems are able to
access treatment services at different stages in their journey
through the criminal justice system;
• identify gaps in the treatment pathway for the target
group;
• examine the obstacles and barriers to effective access
to treatment services and make recommendations
to ensure that any gaps can be filled and barriers removed;
• make recommendations to ensure that those with substance
misuse problems from the Black and minority ethnic
community in the Criminal Justice system can access the kinds
of treatment and support they need at all stages
- from arrest to prison to community treatment and aftercare.
It
is not the comprehensive review called for by the ASK report;
rather it is an attempt to begin a process of research and
reach some initial conclusions concerning the needs of Black
and minority ethnic substance misusers in the criminal justice
system in Nottinghamshire.
Methodology
Mixed
methodologies were employed to gather and analyse the data
for the research project. A combination of focus groups, questionnaires
and secondary data from existing reports and reviews of local
policies and documents were employed to provide both the qualitative
and statistical information within the Reach Report.
The
questionnaires were compiled using the researchers own knowledge
of substance misuse within the Black and minority ethnic community,
along with questions that the researchers felt needed to be
answered.
There
was a particular focus on the employment and training of peer
interviewers to gain access to Black and minority ethnic offenders
with substance misuse problems within the prison system as
well as within the community.
Main
findings
It
is recognised that the research sample is small; with only
25 questionnaires of the initial target of eighty-six having
been completed and returned. Statistically this is not a particularly
significant sample. However, particularly within the qualitative
data gathered, the research has a great deal of validity.
It raises some interesting and challenging questions for treatment
services. The views expressed by those who completed questionnaires
in terms of the effectiveness of wrap-around treatment appear
to point to considerable gaps and failures in treatment services
for Black and minority ethnic substance misusers.
The
questionnaire findings are backed up by the views expressed
by the five participants in the focus group. The focus group
findings provide important qualitative data on the experiences
of Black and minority ethnic substance misusers who have passed
through the criminal justice system.
1.
Profile
The
target group for the research project was male Black and minority
ethnic substance misusers over the age of 18 within the prison
service, engaged with the Probation Service or the local CJIT
or in the community.
The
findings confirm that the target group was reached. All participants
in the research were male and from Black and minority ethnic
communities. The majority were in the age range 30-39. The
largest ethnic groups represented were Black British Caribbean,
Asian British Pakistani and Asian British Indian.
Most
were born in the UK and have lived here for 11 years or more.
The
predominant religion was Islam (38%) for those who completed
questionnaires.
Many
of the target group struggle to deal with painful feelings
such as guilt, isolation, shame, despair and fear as well
as dealing with mental health problems. These are difficult
psychological and mental health issues underlying their drug
addictions which services need to be able to respond to sensitively
and effectively.
2.
Experience of the Criminal Justice System
All
25 of the questionnaire respondents had experienced arrest.
14 were serving a prison sentence with sentences ranging from
30 days to 19.5 years.
Crucially,
16 of the 25 respondents stated that their arrest did not
lead to a drugs test.
Only
7 respondents stated they had been put into contact with a
support agency and only 5 could identify which agency.
It
appears that a significant number of those who took part in
the research did not feel that the staff they encountered
even cared about their problem. Responses to the question
‘Did staff care about you and your problems’ included:
•
Didn’t feel any connection or empathy’
• ‘Becomes boring to them see so many’
• ‘No, [staff did not care] on release will have
to live in bail hostel with drug users’
If
Black and minority ethnic substance misusers in the criminal
justice system feel that staff do not even care about them
there would appear to be little prospect of actively and successfully
engaging them in treatment programmes and aftercare services.
Amongst
respondents there appears to be some confusion concerning
which agency they might be in contact with. For example, there
appears to be confusion about whether a worker is an arrest
referral worker or not? The different roles of workers and
the agencies they represent need to be made clear to service
users.
The
report identifies a need for services to make available culturally
appropriate support to those clients from Black and minority
ethnic communities with substance misuse problems. The best
way to understand what shape these services might need to
take will be to consult with Black and minority ethnic clients
and organisations.
3.
Experiences of Prison
17
of the twenty-five respondents who completed questionnaires
were in prison. Of these, 6 stated that drug use was the reason
they were there.
Responses
to questions asking whether those in prison had seen a treatment
service or probation worker whilst in prison present a very
mixed view. Again there is a lack of clarity about workers,
services and their titles or names.
The
findings concerning respondents’ experiences of drug
treatment whilst in prison paint a similarly unsatisfactory
picture. Only 7 respondents stated that they were offered
any treatment for their drug problem.
Only
7 of 14 respondents who answered the question stated that
they had been offered any kind of support service for their
drug use and only 7 of 14 said they had received any ‘drug
education’.
An
analysis of responses to the questionnaire in particular,
focusing on respondents experiences of prison, highlights
gaps and failings in services to Black and minority ethnic
substance misusers.
[NB
it should be acknowledged that in some instances respondent’s
experiences in prison pre-date thelaunch of the DIP initiative.]
4.
Drug Use
Findings
concerning drug use show that respondents to the questionnaire
used a wide variety of drugs, with crack and heroin being
the drugs of choice for the majority. Respondents to the questionnaire
and those who took part in the focus group stated that they
were spending between less than £50 to over £1000
per week on drugs, with the majority spending between £150
and £550 per week. It is reasonable to assume that this
would have been funded through crime.
When
questioned about their alcohol use, 6 of 17 respondents stated
that they had a problem with alcohol. 7 of 14 respondents
stated that their alcohol use had contributed to their drug
taking and 11 of 13 stated they had frequently mixed drugs
and alcohol. 7 respondents stated that they had substituted
drugs with alcohol.
Overall
these findings paint a picture of the target group mixing
drugs and alcohol and moving between the two when necessary
or when it helped. This highlights the well-established link
between drug and alcohol misuse and points to the need to
develop strategies and provide services that will enable drug
users to tackle their drug and alcohol problems together.
5.
Treatment
Overall,
the findings from both the questionnaire and focus group highlight:
•
Significant gaps in services
•
A regular failure by services to respond to the particular
cultural, spiritual, psychological and emotional
needs of the research group
•
Often
unhelpful attitudes and approaches on behalf of staff and
institutions
The research findings point to the need to significantly improve
services at all stages – from arrest to custody to aftercare.
However,
the picture is not all bleak. Responses to a question about
treatment staff were overall very positive. 8 of 10 respondents
rated their satisfaction with staff as 6 and above on a scale
of 1 to 10 (with 1 as not very satisfied’ and 10 as
‘very satisfied’.)
Both
the questionnaire respondents and those who took part in the
focus group make many useful recommendations as to how services
to Black and minority ethnic substance misusers in the Criminal
Justice system can be changed and improved.
Main
findings
It
is recognised that the research sample is small; with only
25 questionnaires of the initial target of eighty-six having
been completed and returned. Statistically this is not a particularly
significant sample. However, particularly within the qualitative
data gathered, the research has a great deal of validity.
It raises some interesting and challenging questions for treatment
services. The views expressed by those who completed questionnaires
in terms of the effectiveness of wrap-around treatment appear
to point to considerable gaps and failures in treatment services
for Black and minority ethnic substance misusers.
The
questionnaire findings are backed up by the views expressed
by the five participants in the focus group. The focus group
findings provide important qualitative data on the experiences
of Black and minority ethnic substance misusers who have passed
through the criminal justice system.
1.
Profile
The
target group for the research project was male Black and minority
ethnic substance misusers over the age of 18 within the prison
service, engaged with the Probation Service or the local CJIT
or in the community.
The
findings confirm that the target group was reached. All participants
in the research were male and from Black and minority ethnic
communities. The majority were in the age range 30-39. The
largest ethnic groups represented were Black British Caribbean,
Asian British Pakistani and Asian British Indian.
Most
were born in the UK and have lived here for 11 years or more.
The
predominant religion was Islam (38%) for those who completed
questionnaires.
Many
of the target group struggle to deal with painful feelings
such as guilt, isolation, shame, despair and fear as well
as dealing with mental health problems. These are difficult
psychological and mental health issues underlying their drug
addictions which services need to be able to respond to sensitively
and effectively.
2.
Experience of the Criminal Justice System
All
25 of the questionnaire respondents had experienced arrest.
14 were serving a prison sentence with sentences ranging from
30 days to 19.5 years.
Crucially,
16 of the 25 respondents stated that their arrest did not
lead to a drugs test.
Only
7 respondents stated they had been put into contact with a
support agency and only 5 could identify which agency.
It
appears that a significant number of those who took part in
the research did not feel that the staff they encountered
even cared about their problem. Responses to the question
‘Did staff care about you and your problems’ included:
•
Didn’t feel any connection or empathy’
• ‘Becomes boring to them see so many’
• ‘No, [staff did not care] on release will have
to live in bail hostel with drug users’
If
Black and minority ethnic substance misusers in the criminal
justice system feel that staff do not even care about them
there would appear to be little prospect of actively and successfully
engaging them in treatment programmes and aftercare services.
Amongst
respondents there appears to be some confusion concerning
which agency they might be in contact with. For example, there
appears to be confusion about whether a worker is an arrest
referral worker or not? The different roles of workers and
the agencies they represent need to be made clear to service
users.
The
report identifies a need for services to make available culturally
appropriate support to those clients from Black and minority
ethnic communities with substance misuse problems. The best
way to understand what shape these services might need to
take will be to consult with Black and minority ethnic clients
and organisations.
3.
Experiences of Prison
17
of the twenty-five respondents who completed questionnaires
were in prison. Of these, 6 stated that drug use was the reason
they were there.
Responses
to questions asking whether those in prison had seen a treatment
service or probation worker whilst in prison present a very
mixed view. Again there is a lack of clarity about workers,
services and their titles or names.
The
findings concerning respondents’ experiences of drug
treatment whilst in prison paint a similarly unsatisfactory
picture. Only 7 respondents stated that they were offered
any treatment for their drug problem.
Only
7 of 14 respondents who answered the question stated that
they had been offered any kind of support service for their
drug use and only 7 of 14 said they had received any ‘drug
education’.
An
analysis of responses to the questionnaire in particular,
focusing on respondents experiences of prison, highlights
gaps and failings in services to Black and minority ethnic
substance misusers.
[NB
it should be acknowledged that in some instances respondent’s
experiences in prison pre-date thelaunch of the DIP initiative.]
4.
Drug Use
Findings
concerning drug use show that respondents to the questionnaire
used a wide variety of drugs, with crack and heroin being
the drugs of choice for the majority. Respondents to the questionnaire
and those who took part in the focus group stated that they
were spending between less than £50 to over £1000
per week on drugs, with the majority spending between £150
and £550 per week. It is reasonable to assume that this
would have been funded through crime.
When
questioned about their alcohol use, 6 of 17 respondents stated
that they had a problem with alcohol. 7 of 14 respondents
stated that their alcohol use had contributed to their drug
taking and 11 of 13 stated they had frequently mixed drugs
and alcohol. 7 respondents stated that they had substituted
drugs with alcohol.
Overall
these findings paint a picture of the target group mixing
drugs and alcohol and moving between the two when necessary
or when it helped. This highlights the well-established link
between drug and alcohol misuse and points to the need to
develop strategies and provide services that will enable drug
users to tackle their drug and alcohol problems together.
5.
Treatment
Overall,
the findings from both the questionnaire and focus group highlight:
•
Significant gaps in services
•
A regular failure by services to respond to the particular
cultural, spiritual, psychological and emotional
needs of the research group
•
Often
unhelpful attitudes and approaches on behalf of staff and
institutions
The research findings point to the need to significantly improve
services at all stages – from arrest to custody to aftercare.
However,
the picture is not all bleak. Responses to a question about
treatment staff were overall very positive. 8 of 10 respondents
rated their satisfaction with staff as 6 and above on a scale
of 1 to 10 (with 1 as not very satisfied’ and 10 as
‘very satisfied’.)
Both
the questionnaire respondents and those who took part in the
focus group make many useful recommendations as to how services
to Black and minority ethnic substance misusers in the Criminal
Justice system can be changed and improved.
The
full 'REACH REPORT' (2006)
The
full ‘REACH REPORT’ (2006) by the BAC-IN Black
and minority ethnic project is available from:
BAC-IN:
contact Sohan Sahota (Service Manager)
e-mail: sohan.bac_in@yahoo.co.uk
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
DAAT:
contact Chris Kelly (DIP Manager)
e-mail:chris.kelly@nottinghamshirecounty-tpc.nhs.uk
If
you are interested in learning more about the work of BAC-IN
then please contact Sohan, David or Gladstone on 0115 9524333
ext. 321
For download and viewing the full 'Reach Report' in PDF format
click here
(You
will need Adobe Reader to read this file. If you do not have
Adobe Reader then you can download it free by clicking
here.)
COPYRIGHT.©
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY "BAC-IN" 2010
|